Tag Archive | "Urban Planning"

Urban Farming by Jack O`Reilly


Jack O`Reilly – The University of Manchester and Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK

click image to enlarge

———————————————
“The programme proposed provides for the sustainable Manchester. It is centred around food cultures and media networks. Sustainability can be improved by the production of food in urban spaces, sourcing local foods and selling the produce of local farmers.
In essence sustainability cannot survive with out promotion , promoted mainly through current media outputs. Therefore Manchester requires a scheme that produces its own food and has the capabilities to promote this action through media, such as TV broadcasts.”

This program is known as:
URBAN F.@.M.I.N (Urban farming and media interactive networks). Vegetables and fruit are grown hydroponically using water from the canal, which mainly serves as a transport route. The crop produced is sold back to Manchester reducing the cities reliance on importing foreign goods and generates an income to sustain the project. The crop is used in the restaurant, which in turn promotes the urban farming and sustainability to the user.
To reach the widest possible audience a TV studio is integrated which produces programmes
based around food cultures and sustainability.
One of the key points of the scheme is to teach people about sustainable approaches to living. An exhibition space with a ‘hands on learning experience’ allows people of all ages to learn about possible new technologies for the ‘future city’ before seeing them in use on either the farm or TV studio.”
———————————————

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge


—————————————————————————————————————————————

—————————————————————————————————————————————

Posted in Features, NewsComments (0)

DEVE Architects Wins EUROPAN 10 for Augustenborg, Denmark


DEVE Architects

The proposal “The Modern Castle” by Danish practice DEVE Architects has won the EUROPAN 10 contest for Augustenborg, Denmark in the category Urban Plan and Buildings.
—————————————–

click image to enlarge

Project Details:
YEAR: 2009 -
TYPE: COMPETITION
CATEGORI: URBAN PLAN AND BUILDINGS
STATUS: 1ST PRIZE
SIZE: 103.500 m²
LOCATION:AUGUSTENBORG, DENMARK
TEAM: MORTEN VEDELSBØL, SCOTT GRBAVAC, AXEL THEMAN, CADMAN
—————————-

click image to enlarge

—————————-
THE MODERN CASTLE
“How can Augustenborg revitalize the local connection to its unique natural environment while asserting itself as a significant cultural node within the region?

With its rich history and beautiful natural landscape, Augustenborg has the potential to play an important role in the further growth and development of Als.

The city lies at an important point along the main traffic artery connecting the ferry terminal at Fynshavn across the island, and benefits from a close proximity to thriving Sønderborg. This relationship to Sønderborg, as well as its location compared to other Als cities puts Augustenborg in a unique position to be a significant node within the middle of the island. The existing natural landscape, which includes dense forests and the scenic Augustenborg fjord, also contributes to the city’s unique character.
—————————————————
Video-interview with Morten Vedelsbøl at DAC
YouTube Preview Image
—————————————————
The predominant social characteristic of modern Augustenborg, is the yacht culture which has developed due to the ideal sailing environment in the fjord. Historically, Augustenborg Palace was the driving force behind the growth and development of the city of Augustenborg, and it remains a prominent building and even place of employment in the region. The industrial facilities which currently define the harbor once played a more important role in the economy of Augustenborg, however the scale and use of those structures are now the primary barrier between the residents and the water that has such a profound influence on the culture in the city. While the large structures are particularly imposing, that physical presence has left an indelible mark on the city that is an important aspect of Augustenborg.

By preserving some of the existing industrial structures, and infusing them with some of the cultural relevance of a castle, it is possible to create a vibrant new extension of the city. Historic Augustenborg Palace initially dictated the shape and growth of Augustenborg, but now a Modern Castle is required to establish a true city center in Augustenborg that can serve the entire region’s cultural and technological needs. The new city center will seize the waterfront from industry and provide more intimate moments of interaction for all people within the natural environment.”
—————————-

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

—————————-
Cultural Epoch
Augustenborg Palace shaped the growth of the city with its symmetry and axes. The industrial facilities currently define the city’s relationship to the fjord. By concentrating new and upgraded cultural institutions within the existing industrial infrastructure, the repurposed buildings can assume the gravity of a medieval castle in order to influence Augustenborg’s morphology. The new cultural node then serves as a physical city center that also establishes a strong relationship with the water.

Medieval city in the Landscape
Construction on the marina side is to be kept low and green in order to preserve the continuity of the distant landscape. The city side of the harbor is built into a dense urban core, inspired by medieval walled cities. The buildings create a perimeter around a variety of connected public spaces with the exposed grid structure acting as the gate.

Promenade as a Social Spine
The public plazas of the medieval city maintain a link to Augustenborg Palace and connect the path across the embankment to the different utility spaces and a nature path on the marina side. The two different uses are defined individually by wood and concrete and collide at a harbor bath located on the embankment.

Connecting views
The views of the adjacent housing is kept undisturbed by the new structure. Lines from the southern piers penetrate the cityplan and establishe a strong visual connection between the two sides, ‘knitting’ them togerher.

Infrastructure
The new area is built as a pedestrian-oriented environment, with cars kept in the background. Parking is located in the dark areas of the plan which are otherwise unused. Pedestrians and bikers can thereby roam free, establishing a vibrant and friendly city.

Environmental Plans
The two sides of the fjord utilize their contrasting natures to harvest energy in complimentary ways, and the embankment acts as a conduit for the transfer of energy between them. On the marina side, the open landscape is farmed for energy using ground source heat pumps, windmills, and biogas. The urban side uses the roofscapes to harvest solar energy and kinetic plates in the parking area to generate energy.
—————————-

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge


——————————————————————————————————————————–

——————————————————————————————————————————–

Posted in Competitions, Competitions & Events, NewsComments (0)

Shuffle – Europan 10 competition by Eriksen Skajaa Architects


Eriksen Skajaa Architects

photo by Eriksen Skajaa Architects - click image to enlarge


————————————————
Project Details:
Project: Shuffle – Europan 10 competition
Location: Oslo, Norway
Year: 2009
Type: Competition
Category: Urban plan and buildings
Status: 1st prize
Size: 15000 m²
Architect: Eriksen Skajaa Architects
Team:Arild Eriksen, Joakim Skajaa
Contact: mail@eriksenskajaa.no
Introduction:

Eriksen Skajaa Architects, a small architecture practice run by Arild Eriksen and Joakim Skajaa has won the Europan 10 competition in Oslo with their project Shuffle. The project is exploring low rise/high density urban planning as a way to reinforce local identity, making use of passive-house concepts to shape the buildings
————————————————

photo by Eriksen Skajaa Architects - click image to enlarge

Project Description:
Weave, Shuffle, Flip, Intensify….Study area strategy

The main challenges in the study area are the homogenous zones that undermine cross connections and permeability. In the perspective of sustainability and ecology, large areas in the study area are under-utilised. We have developed three main strategies to facilitate a new development in the study area:

Weave
The forested paths on Haugerud are places of natural beauty and create a strong sense of place and identity. We propose to extend the network of forested paths through the study area to facilitate interconnections and permeability; both through the new development and through existing homogenous strips like the school area or the social housing.
—————-

Study Area Plan - photo by Eriksen Skajaa Architects - click image to enlarge

photo by Eriksen Skajaa Architects - click image to enlarge

—————-
Shuffle
We propose to shuffle the existing program in the study area to enhance the life in the area and intensify the utilization of space. Low quality space will be upgraded through this strategy. Examples could be the colonisation of garden allotments, sports programs found in the middle of housing areas and an activity center in the new development shared by the school. Penetrating these boundaries is an important step in the groundwork for a new identity.
—————-

Site Plan (photo by: Eriksen Skajaa Architects) - click image to enlarge

—————-
Flip
Flip is a strategy for turning the buildings in the area towards the public space. The school buildings and the centre all turn their back on the public space. By creating public spaces we also want to give them a clear direction. In our proposal we remove most of the existing centre and make facades that open up towards the new public space.

Intensify
Some key points in the study area will be used for more specific program to create specila points of interest. The metro station is already one such point and will be given an upgrade and modern bike parking facilities. The high rise building will be converted into a health/ wellness centre. Public activity centres will be points of special interest to the young and old people that spend time in the area.
—————-

photo by Eriksen Skajaa Architects - click image to enlarge

photo by Eriksen Skajaa Architects - click image to enlarge

photo by Eriksen Skajaa Architects - click image to enlarge

—————-
Inventing urbanity. Ecology versus intensity.
We propose a new development on the site based on sustainable ecological principles and the need for a semi -urban typology that can cater to the dual need of new housing typologies (young/ elderly/ small families) and a restructuring of the local retail economy. Grid orientation, formal characteristics, facades and construction methods where determined by the passive house standard. The shaping of the volumes brings light in between the streets and to the solar facades, but it also gives houses individual character.

Through this process we have developed a clear urban typology consisting of a relatively small scale urban unit that is combined in a dense configuration. The unit can accommodate both the existing and proposed programs such as health and recreations centers. There is flexibility within the modules to develop a wide range of housing solutions ranging from individual houses to blocks of flats. The ground floors have all been made as flexible as possible so that they can shift between housing and retail functions.
—————-

photo by Eriksen Skajaa Architects - click image to enlarge


—————-
Through a high degree of fragmentation we open up possibilities that the large scale existing structures can’t cater to. We foresee in the beginning that a few small scale shops could function in the area, but we also see that this can be the framework for a development where retail and recreation colonise the entire development. This is the concept we call shuffle. Another possible outcome is that the area becomes more a housing area and that people continue to do their shopping in the neighboring areas. We create flexibility within the framework of a strong urban typology.

Urban intensity in this context means not so much an extreme number of people on a small lot, it means living and working in close proximity to each other and shared public space. Larger types of public space such as school yards, fields, football pitches and parking lots are abundant in the area, so we have deliberately tried to make the public spaces small enough to generate types of proximity that will be an addition to the whole area. As permeability is a strategy of the project we will add smaller volumes to create a town or Medina with buildings that can easily fit into the fabric with another program. We believe the feeling of the small scale village will strengthen the identity of Haugerud, as well as offering an attraction. ”
———————————————————————————————————

———————————————————————————————————

Posted in Competitions, Competitions & Events, Features, NewsComments (2)

A City in Search of Good Fortune


The Design Observer Group

Buenaventura, Colombia

——————–
Report: Quilian Riano & Dk Osseo-Asare

“Mention to anyone in Colombia’s capital, Bogota, that you are planning a trip to the port city of Buenaventura, on the Pacific Coast, and you will likely encounter stern warnings and looks of disbelief. Buenaventura holds a special, troubled place in the Colombian psyche. For decades the inability of the federal government to tame the hyper-violent city — despite efforts by the wildly popular and controversial president Alvaro Uribe — typifies the disruptive power of what has become a zone of insurgency — Colombia’s “wild frontier.” As recently as a few years ago, drug traffickers and right-wing militants fought daily turf wars in the city’s slums while guerrillas and paramilitaries battled for control of the sole access route to the city through the Andes. Although a massive military presence has dramatically improved security, even today skirmishes are not uncommon along the main road into the city, where the guerrillas now fight U.S.-trained Colombian government forces.

Ultimately the battle for Buenaventura is about control. The city of Buenaventura (population 325,000), home to one of Colombia’s largest and most profitable seaports, is also close to the country’s most productive coca fields. This strategic location accounts for the city’s shadow economy of illegal cocaine exports and imported black market dollars, which flow along with regulated products like coffee and sugar cane. External forces (the central government, shareholders of Buenaventura’s privately owned port authority, the U.S. State Department) seek to regulate the city in order to ensure an uninterrupted flow of legal goods. At the same time, a parallel set of local players (guerrillas, paramilitaries, drug lords) prefers instead to maintain a status quo of informal instability that enables the transshipment of illegal drugs to markets in Western Europe and the United States.
——————————————————————————————————————————-

——————————————————————————————————————————-
But even as Buenaventurans work to improve their collective condition, they are caught in this tangled web of competing interests that exploit the city for profit (legal and illegal) yet fail to invest in the its future. Part of the problem is that many in the country perceive Buenaventura as peripheral. Physically, the city is remote — an island located at the western edge of the Andes. Economically, it is marginal…. ”

Read the rest of the articles at The Design Observer Group

Posted in News, PublicationsComments (1)

A declaration of love for the city as it is


Archined

“Sooner or later many urban neighbourhoods have to contend with a lengthy period of decline, demolition and new construction. This ‘interval period’ offers opportunities for alternative uses and new initiatives. Many of them disappear again, however, as soon as renewal is complete. A half-finished block of houses in the Transvaal district in The Hague formed the setting for the workshop entitled ‘Urban Transformation in the Interim’ on Thursday October 15. The workshop reflected on the qualities generated during this interim period and on ways to ensure that these qualities don’t vanish.”
———————-

Workshop in the interim (photo: Marc Heeman)

Workshop in the interim (photo: Marc Heeman)

———————-
The workshop formed the presentation and closing event of the ‘Laboratory for the Interim’, a series of studies in which architects, designers and artists examined the restructuring of the Transvaal district over a period of two years. They looked at the possibilities that open up in the ‘interim period’ to use vacant premises and disused sites, and asked whether transformation should take another course. The laboratory was a follow-up to Hotel Transvaal, an art project that took place in Transvaal from the summer of 2007 to the autumn of 2008. This hotel lodged itself in temporarily vacated houses scattered across the neighbourhood, with breakfast provided by a local caterer. The period of transformation, often experienced as negative owing to decline and vacancy, formed the impetus for hospitality and welcome.
———————-

Presentations in half-finished block of houses (Photo: Marc Heeman)

Presentations in half-finished block of houses (Photo: Marc Heeman)

———————-
The laboratory participants found inspiration in the charm of empty places, in informal use, and in the liveliness of small-scale business ventures. They devised concepts in which the available spaces could accommodate and stimulate commercial activity, proposing everything from a car-repair garage to a constitution for the interim. In addition, the participants questioned the way in which the transformation process is now tackled. Would it not be better to stop viewing this as a project with a starting date and completion date and, instead, approach it as a continuous process? After all, the city is constantly subject to change.

Bernadette Janssen (urban designer at BVR), Corine Keus (E19 architects) and Henk Jan Bouwmeester (philosopher/artist/designer) came up with an alternative model in which the transformation of Transvaal Noord, a section of the neighbourhood that has not yet been tackled, is spread over a longer period. Their advice is not to wait until decline sets in everywhere but to invest right now in qualities. Don’t focus attention on problems but strengthen existing qualities in the housing stock and public space, is their message. If the basic value of a neighbourhood is maintained and pearls are created here and there, then the value of property, and of the entire urban structure, will be boosted. That will allow a neighbourhood to develop very gradually, with just minor bad patches though no major ruptures.
———————-

coffee break in the interim (photo: Marc Heeman)

coffee break in the interim (photo: Marc Heeman)

———————-
The results of the ‘Laboratory for the Interim’ reveal the ideal of a healthy and dynamic urban ecosystem that gradually adapts as time passes. To achieve this, many projects place emphasis on strengthening relations and exchange between residents, housing stock, economic activity and public space. But how do you change an area – where a large number of homes are owned by one housing association: Staedion – from a centrally run structure into a self-organising system? For the men and women at the wheel, it’s as though they have to transfer their passengers from a sturdy ocean-going steamer to wobbly rowing boats.

But it hasn’t come to that yet. During the morning session philosopher René Boomkens spoke about the memory of the city, a memory that consists physically of buildings, streets, parks and squares, but to an important extent also of the everyday environment of residents and occupants. When large-scale demolition takes place and residents have to move elsewhere in large numbers, this memory is largely erased. In Transvaal one can clearly see how that works. On the walk from the tram to the workshop location one can see how ‘radical’ the restructuring has been undertaken up to now. Whole streets have disappeared to make way for brand-new development that bears no memory of what used to be there. This is not a subtle facelift but a complete makeover.

Boomkens also points out another problem. According to him the ‘Laboratory for the Interim’ relates to the dominant city development in the same way that the Slow Food movement relates to McDonalds. In this comparison, the fast food giant stands for ‘the same taste, the same smile, the same turnover – everywhere’, while Slow Food stands for ‘inefficient, slow, different every season, local, small-scale, yet extremely profitable in spite of all that because it’s expensive’. The danger of this comparison for city development, says Boomkens, is exclusiveness and elitism. For problem neighbourhoods like Transvaal are mostly home to immigrants and low-income white residents with little education – typical McDonalds customers, according to Boomkens. He wonders whether initiatives like the ‘Laboratory for the Interim’ – whose participants are usually members of the creative classes who have little in common with the residents of the neighbourhoods in which they operate – can bridge that gap.
———————-

a walk through Transvaal (photo: Marc Heeman)

a walk through Transvaal (photo: Marc Heeman)

———————-
Enthusiasts of the interim therefore steer a middle course between two gaps — that with administrators and that with residents. It is the paradox of designers and artists drawn to the plight of problem districts. They argue for a bottom-up approach and for engagement with events, yet at the same time they are relative outsiders who project their ideas on a situation that they are scarcely part of. That distance is also their strength, however. For they can put their finger on the tender spot without having to be brought to account immediately. They can reveal, depict and highlight hidden qualities. And that is therefore what Boomkens advises them to do: compile an archive of special and everyday urban phenomena — from the history of a neighbourhood supermarket to interventions in the interim — and then make that archive available on Internet. A declaration of love for the city as it is, and an inexhaustible source to build on – though that isn’t always so easy in practice.”
———————-
Info:
The Laboratory for the Interim was initiated by Iris Schutten and Sabrina Lindemann. The workshop was organised by them in collaboration with Trancity.
———————————————————————————————————-

———————————————————————————————————-

Posted in Events, NewsComments (1)

cityLAB Design Competition WPA 2.0 Rides Perfect Storm in DC


cityLAB

“WPA 2.0: Working Public Architecture, the design competition organized by UCLA’s cityLAB, culminated with the announcement of “Carbon T.A.P.// Tunnel Algae Park” as the winning proposal of the professional competition and “R_Ignite” and “Aquaculture Canal_New Orleans” as the winning proposals of the student competition – WPA 2.0 (SE).”
——————————————————
YouTube Preview Image
Winner of the professional competition: “Carbon T.A.P.// Tunnel Algae Park” by PORT architects Andrew Moddrell and Christopher Marcinkoski (Chicago/New York). Video by Richie Gelles
——————————————————
“UCLA Architecture and Urban Design Chair Hitoshi Abe, Dana Cuff, cityLAB director, and Roger Sherman, cityLAB codirector congratulated the winners at the conclusion of a day-long symposium in Washington, DC on November 16. Housing and Urban Development’s Ron Sims and Adolfo Carrion of the White House Office of Urban Affairs urged those gathered at the symposium at the National Building Museum to think outside the box, and to “boldly lead us to places we have never gone before.” The federal administration is primed for innovative thinking about urban issues, creating a perfect storm for designers to lead the way. The WPA 2.0 winners do just that.

click image to enlarge - Carbon T.A.P.// Tunnel Algae Park

click image to enlarge - Carbon T.A.P.// Tunnel Algae Park

————————-
“Carbon T.A.P.// Tunnel Algae Park” is the brainchild of PORT architects Andrew Moddrell and Christopher Marcinkoski of Chicago and New York. The proposal uses algae pontoons to capture mobile-source carbon-dioxide emissions along New York City’s transportation arteries and employ them in bio-fuel production, creating an urban park with structured wetlands, aquatic and avian habitat, recreation amenities, as well as high speed bike lanes and public promenades. The jury of Elizabeth Diller, Cecil Balmond, Marilyn Taylor, Walter Hood, Stan Allen, and Thom Mayne was unanimous in its decision, citing two primary qualities: The floating, carbon-capturing bridge between Brooklyn and Manhattan would be a visible marker for the tunnel hidden below, and the periodic rotation of the parkway across the river had the power to reshape the image of the city.”
————————-

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

————————-
Winning Projects of the WPA 2.0 Student Competition:
“R_Ignite” was designed by four graduate students of the Manchester School of Architecture – Peter Millar, Jamie Potter, Andy Wilde and Stuart Wheeler. This proposal revitalizes port cities and greens the shipwrecking industry through the addition of recycling and social activities.

click image to enlarge - Joint winner of the student competition: “R_Ignite” by Peter Millar, Jamie Potter, Andy Wilde, Stuart Wheeler (Manchester)

click image to enlarge - Joint winner of the student competition: “R_Ignite” by Peter Millar, Jamie Potter, Andy Wilde, Stuart Wheeler (Manchester)

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

————————-
“Aquaculture Canal_New Orleans,” by Fadi Masoud, a Landscape Architecture student at the University of Toronto, envisions the New Orleans’ Industrial Canal as productive infrastructure for flood control and aquaculture. The jury noted that the winning submissions were ideal as a pair, representing the range of innovative ideas relevant to WPA 2.0.

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge


————————-
For the WPA 2.0 competition, more than 300 proposals – half from professional teams, half from student teams – , envisioned a new legacy of publicly-supported infrastructure hybrids. The projects explore the value of infrastructure not only as an engineering endeavor, but as a robust design opportunity to revitalize communities. Students from China to the United Kingdom submitted proposals to WPA 2.0 (SE) tackling the problems of America’s next generation of public works. Seven student finalists’ proposals were exhibited at the National Building Museum: Re-Ignite, Aquaculture Canal_New Orleans, Polytechnic HighSchool and Transportation Center by Douglas Segulja, Fluctuating Freeway Ecologies by The Crop, urban ConAgraculture by Dale Luebbert, Cash for Clunkers = Bike Sharing for Chicago by Matt Moore, and Topographic Infrastructure: Hollywood Freeway Central Park by Meng Yang.

The six finalists from the professional competition presented their work at the symposium, and exhibited creative videos that animated their projects, bringing them to life. They are: PORT (Chicago/New York), Lateral Office / Infranet Lab (Toronto), Rael San Fratello Architects (Oakland), UrbanLab (Chicago), aershop (Los Angeles), and Nicholas de Monchaux & Collaborators (Berkeley).

The symposium, held in the impressive Great Hall of the National Building Museum, allowed experts to examine infrastructure from a range of unique yet critically integrated perspectives. In his keynote address, White House Director of Urban Affairs, Adolfo Carrion, praised all the finalists for imaginatively engaging the future of American cities. His words were echoed by HUD Deputy Secretary Ron Sims who called on designers to reimagine public works in terms of sustainability, community, and jobs. Director of cityLAB and UCLA Professor Dana Cuff, said the cityLAB team followed his advice. “The cityLAB team spent the entire day after the symposium taking the message to agency heads and legislators on Capitol Hill. We showed them that designers have the vision to bring innovative policies to reality. Our timing couldn’t have been better.”

More information about the winners and the competition can be found on the WPA 2.0 website at http://wpa2.aud.ucla.edu/info/.
Sponsors of WPA 2.0 include: The Graham Foundation, Skidmore, Owings and Merrill, LLC, Buro Happold, UCLA School of the Arts and Architecture, The Architect’s Newspaper, The National Building Museum, The Ziman Center for Real Estate Development, Sarah Jane Lind, the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture.
———————————————————————————————————

———————————————————————————————————

Posted in Competitions, Competitions & Events, NewsComments (2)

Better Underground


Triple Canopy

by Urban China, translated by John Thompson

When cities reach their breaking point, life must be moved beneath the surface. China’s subterranean-development expert speaks.
——————

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

“FOR THE FIRST TIME in human history, more people live in cities than outside them. As metropolises blossom throughout the world, and as existing urban centers struggle to cope with influxes of immigrants, more and more governments are turning to the underground. Developments beneath the earth’s surface aim to ease congestion, salvage open spaces aboveground, and provide some reprieve for cities in search of solutions to the problems posed by teeming populations and inadequate infrastructure.

Shu Yu has been at the forefront of underground urban planning for decades. He spent many years studying in Japan, the home of modern subterranean development, before bringing his expertise to bear on his homeland, China. He currently lives in Shanghai, where he is a professor at Tongji University, vice director of the Tongji University Underground Space Research Center, and president of the Shanghai-Tongji Underground Space Planning and Design Research Institute. He is extensively involved in the planning of the myriad southern Chinese cities where populations have exploded over the past half century, and has been charged with designing the underground portion of the 2010 World Expo in Shanghai.

What follows is an exposition of the history and current uses of underground urban space, as told to Tong Zhen. It is excerpted from a longer interview with Shu Yu that was published last year in Urban China magazine and translated from Chinese by John Thompson.”
———————————————————-

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

““URBAN UNDERGROUND SPACE” simply refers to space below a city’s surface: either man-made spaces formed through excavation or caves formed by natural processes. Besides being a geologic fact, the realm under the earth’s surface can be seen as a potential space for development.

Mankind has a long-standing history of developing underground space. Consider, for instance, the Peking Man site at Zhoukoudian, and the dwellings in the Loess Plateau of western China. People lived in the caves and planted crops in the ground overhead. In response to environmental pollution and energy crises, modern cities have employed eco-friendly architecture like green roofing, which essentially derives from Chinese cave dwellings.

If we want to resolve urban problems related to population density and limited surface space, we must turn to underground development. It’s a matter of “ascending to the sky and reaching into the earth.” Today, underground space is still used primarily for disaster protection. During World War II, Paris turned abandoned caves into ammunition depots, secret outposts, and arsenals. London used subways. Now China plans to construct integrated civil-defense projects designed to prepare for military conflict and protect against natural disasters. For instance, rain from torrential downpours cannot adequately be drained through sewer systems and often produces flooding. Constructing underground rivers is a relatively easy solution to this problem, and it creates a sustainable way of dealing with rainwater.

There are also significant stores of energy underground. Shanghai’s average annual temperature is about 16 degrees Celsius; underground, it’s a little bit lower, and without much seasonal fluctuation. By exchanging energy between the surface and the underground in accordance with the laws of stratigraphic temperature differences, we can cool the surface in the summer and warm it up in the winter. At the 2010 Shanghai World Expo, the main hall’s air-conditioning system will get about 80 percent of its energy from geothermal and hydrothermal heat pumps.

Of course, underground space is also used for transportation, storage, infrastructure, and shopping. Japan is planning to build underground shopping districts connecting subway stops. They will be two to three levels, with the first level for shops and public walkways, and the second floor on down for parking garages and subway stations. It’s convenient and cozy, and the profits are remarkable.

But this kind of development is only possible when the cost of surface expropriation and demolition exceeds that of underground construction, which generally has two to three times the start-up costs of surface construction. Our research shows that once a city’s per capita GDP tops $3,000, underground development becomes economical. Many Chinese cities now reach or surpass this threshold; in the cities that have over one million people, surface transportation is inefficient, unpunctual, and uncomfortable. Forty cities in China currently have plans in place to build subway and rail lines to remedy these problems. The experience of other countries shows us that the key to developing underground space in
China is the intensive development of rail transport.

Foreign businesses with experience in developed nations have begun building underground in the downtowns of Chinese cities. Shanghai already has in use 30 million square meters of underground facilities. For the Shanghai World Expo, I’m working on underground integrated government facilities, energy-source centers, a series of high-tech guidance systems, and an underground safety-evaluation system. All of these efforts serve the expo’s theme: “Better City, Better Life.”
—————————

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

—————————
THE USE OF UNDERGROUND SPACE varies from North America to Western Europe to Asia, according to differences in land, economy, society, culture, and climate. The United States has a very innovative, progressive model. When a city reaches the point at which the existence of overpasses becomes a restriction to urban development, they knock them down and take them underground. Boston had an overpass built in the 1970s that improved transportation in the city but weakened the vitality of the vibrant areas alongside the highway, turning it into a dead space. In order to revitalize the city center, the government decided to take the overpass underground and landscape the surface, revitalizing the area.

Canada is a northern country with five months or more of unrelenting winter cold, which makes living and working there inconvenient. Taking advantage of the 1967 World Expo in Montreal, the city built a subway system. A network of underground pedestrian walkways connected the basements of the major buildings around each stop. Underground plazas and common spaces were linked to commercial areas, forming a true underground city. The government gave companies the right to use the subterranean space, drew up technological standards, established design requirements that would satisfy the public’s
needs, stipulated opening and closing times, and encouraged commerce by paying for construction and providing security. This kind of experience—the city guiding private enterprise in the development of underground space—is worth learning from.
—————————

click image to enlarge

click image to enlarge

—————————
“Europe’s exemplar is the Parisian “twin-level city” of La Defense. This modern underground business center integrates rail transport and roads, leaving nothing but open space on the surface. Buildings have six-level basements, so all kinds of facilities have been placed underground. The city’s lifeblood runs through these underground spaces, truly realizing the dream of a “twin-level city”! Paris has also seen the transformation of the shopping mall. As the city expanded in the middle of the century, its longtime central marketplace at Les Halles went into decline. In 1971, the city dismantled the market and began building a railway hub and mall on the site, using the construction of the rail lines as an opportunity for large-scale revitalization. The remaining structures were preserved, and the new project was rendered in an excellent combination of modern, contemporary, and ancient styles. It was christened in 1977 as Forum des Halles, a four-story underground shopping area with a recessed plaza, fountains, mosaics, and a wax museum.

In Asia, Japan has made the greatest strides in developing underground space. Following the construction of underground railways, Japan started building other facilities beneath its cities. Osaka has a completely integrated underground city center; urbanites can go about their daily business without ever setting foot on the surface. By the late ’50s, the reputation of Osaka’s underground street—translated into English as “underground shopping center”—had spread internationally and become known as a crystallization of theoretical approaches and building methods. The area occupied by this development was public, so the government held the land-use rights; it provided funds for transportation and let famous commercial
brands open stores. This led to the founding of the cooperative Underground Street Company Limited. In 2001, Japan implemented the Underground Special Use Measures, which granted land-use rights to public services. This was a major breakthrough, as it resolved the problem of building public works underneath privately owned land. Previously, subway projects had been delayed for years because of objections by property owners. China should learn from this regulation.”
—————————
Better Underground

“FOR UNDERGROUND DEVELOPMENTS to be successful, you have to find a way to get around the problems of light, moisture, and noise. People associate the underground with tombs and bomb shelters. On the surface, the field of vision is broad: You can see light, trees, people going about their business. Underground, in a sealed space, you can’t; it’s difficult for people to see how they might escape if something happens. If the air quality isn’t sufficiently regulated, it will give off an
“underground smell.” Generally, cramped, closed spaces make people agitated and uncomfortable. We are still researching the underground environment to determine the extent to which its characteristics affect physiology and psychology.

We need to make the bodily experience of being underground not feel like you’re underground. We should change the composition of the underground environment—the space’s lighting, shadows, colors, materials, shape, and texture—so that it matches what people are used to above ground. We should change the quality and flow of air. We are also thinking of ways to introduce key elements of the natural environment underground, such as sunlight, green plants, flowing water, and small animals. If we can’t do that, we can at least project images of surface life onto the walls underground.”
————————–
Digital image collages by Natalie Labriola: Subterranean Mini-Mall; Guardians of the Fallout Shelter; Sleep-Away Bunker; Snow Day; Out of Business; Stalagmite Yoga Chamber; Tunnel Vision Quest. Above Image: Shanghai World Expo mascot Haibao, who is rendered in the form of the Chinese character ren, which symbolizes human beings; his name means “treasure of the sea.”
————————–
Source: Triple Canopy
——————————————————————————————————————————–

——————————————————————————————————————————–

Posted in News, PublicationsComments (3)

AA IE Summer School 2009 “Rethinking the Azca District”


IE School of Architecture

Students of Architecture from 9 different countries redesigned the AZCA District in a workshop led by IE School of Architecture and the Architectural Association School of London.


——————————————————————————————————
Introduction:

“URBAN ENCOUNTERS In July 2009 two leading independent schools of architecture, the Architectural Association, London and IE School of Architecture, Madrid/ Segovia, will join forces to launch a new summer school in Madrid, one of Europe’s most dynamic capital cities. The intensive 10-day studio-based design workshop is open to students, young architects and other designers worldwide. Participants will investigate new architectural and urban design approaches within the context of Madrid. The workshop will focus on the redesign and redevelopment of an iconic site located in the core of the city.

Urban Endurance & Hybrid Spaces: Rethinking the AZCA District The AZCA district in Madrid underwent a rapid transformation in the middle decades of the twentieth century. Designated as a special zoning district, the 190-hectare site was envisioned as a great business centre with high-rise buildings for finance, offices, housing, hotel, commercial use and open space. Following models derived from old dominant principles, it was driven by a combination of factors that quickly contributed to its decay, demise and disuse. Like other large-scale developments elsewhere in Europe, it became obsolete as it failed to keep pace with the many ways in which building types, open spaces and public use patterns evolved since the time of its construction. Focusing on the AZCA district, the workshop will emphasise the way in which emergent urban ideas, experimental design strategies, processual working methods and hybrid public initiatives can be brought to bear on such sites in order to fundamentally improve public life in the city. The course will explore how architectural thinking can be stimulated via design activities.

Students will investigate alternative architectures and critical ways of working across new design platforms, collaborative media and material systems in order to visualise proposals and ideas that in turn are intended to energise larger political, professional and public discussions about the future of the AZCA district. Each workshop group will define its own vision for future buildings, relating the specifics of a real case-study to a consideration of issues such as urban density, high-rise structures in the city, the nature of open space and the possibilities of uniting parks and urban farms. Emphasis in the teaching will be placed on emergent computational design tools alongside interdisciplinary representational techniques, with the working groups creating collective strategies and approaches.”
—————————————————————————————————–

—————————————————————————————————–

Posted in News, Videos & InterviewsComments (1)

Mediapolis @ one-north


Mediapolis @ one-north is a unique collaboration among four government agencies – JTC Corporation as the master planner and master developer, the Media Development Authority, the Infocomm Development Authority and the Economic Development Board. When completed, Mediapolis @ one-north will be a vital piece of Singapore’s media ecosystem that will add significant depth and scale to Singapore’s media infrastructure. It will serve as the crucible for creating and distributing content from Singapore to the world.
————————————————————————————————-

Artist impression of the vibrant streetscape at Mediapolis @ one-north.  (photo courtesy of JTC Corporation)

Artist impression of the vibrant streetscape at Mediapolis @ one-north. (photo courtesy of JTC Corporation)

Mediapolis is strategically located within one-north, a 200-ha R&D hub that is master-planned and master-developed by JTC. one-north is a vibrant hotspot for test-bedding, innovation and R&D hub. Mediapolis will be the third strategic industry cluster in one-north, after Biopolis (for biomedical sciences) and Fusionopolis (for infocomm technology, media, science and engineering industries).

Mediapolis @ one-north will be a self-contained center of expertise providing strategic media infrastructure for local and international media businesses and activities. It will house a media ecosystem comprising incubators, R&D activities, content development, digital production, broadcasting, industry-responsive education, intellectual property and digital rights management. These will be anchored by shared facilities (such as sound stages, advanced digital screen studios, sound recording studios and motion capture studios) and services (such as equips and grips, costumes and sets as well as film processing lab). Mediapolis @ one-north will also house specialised media schools which provides industry-responsive education and training.

Overview - map of Mediapolis @ one-north. (photo courtesy of JTC Corporation )

Overview - map of Mediapolis @ one-north. (photo courtesy of JTC Corporation )

Mediapolis @ one-north will focus on the development of high quality digital media content as well as R&D in interactive digital media. It will be supported by a strong and robust IT infrastructure and a synergistic business environment.

A 19 ha plot within one-north has been earmarked for the development of Mediapolis. The development will be demand driven by the industry and carried out in phases. When fully developed, there will be business park space to house quality digital production and post production facilities. R&D laboratories located within Mediapolis will also play a key role to boost R&D efforts in digital media technologies to capture the increasing demand for innovative applications, services and devices.

Soundstage at Mediapolis @ one-north (photo courtesy of JTC Corporation )

Soundstage at Mediapolis @ one-north (photo courtesy of JTC Corporation )

The master plan for Mediapolis @ one-north was unveiled in December 2008. The development of Phase one has started earlier in 2009 with the building of a sound stage complex on a 1.2 ha plot by Infinite Frameworks, a Singapore media production company. This first soundstage complex which will allow film-makers and production houses to shoot high-definition and 3-D movies is expected to be completed by 2012.”

Text & Photos by JTC Corporation
————————————————————————————————–

————————————————————————————————–

Posted in NewsComments (1)

To Cite or To Site: Competing Ideologies for Addressing Homelessness


from Planetizen
by: Nate Berg

To fight homelessness, some cities provide services, some build housing, and some arrest people. Often it’s a combination of the three, but now many critics are calling on officials to de-emphasize the law enforcement element. Los Angeles is Ground Zero.

“On any given night in America, there are about 664,000 people sleeping on the street. On that same night in Los Angeles, there are more than 40,000 — the highest concentration of homeless people in any American city. Many of these homeless people can be found in downtown L.A.’s infamous ‘Skid Row’ neighborhood. This 50-square block area has been called ground zero for homelessness in the U.S. and one of the most-policed areas in the world, but the thousands bundled in sleeping bags and tents on its sidewalks every night call it home.

They’ve been doing it for decades, and though it’s frowned upon by many in the city – from politicians to law enforcement officials to business leaders to regular residents – it is an accepted reality. The Los Angeles Police Department and the homeless population of Skid Row have a kind of informal agreement that once night falls the area becomes an unofficial campsite. Tents are left standing and occupants are allowed to sleep through the night, uninterrupted by flashlights and badges. Uninterrupted, that is, if all people are doing is sleeping. Any other illegal activity remains subject to punishment, especially since the adoption of a “zero-tolerance” enforcement policy in 2006. Particularly high numbers of citations and arrests in this part of town show that for the LAPD, to permit homeless people to sleep on public property is not to look blindly on its consequences.

The Midnight Mission in Downtown Los Angeles' Skid Row. a 2008 report from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development estimates that there are roughly 5,000 homeless people sleeping in Skid Row on any given night -- the highest concentration of homeless people in the country.

The Midnight Mission in Downtown Los Angeles' Skid Row. a 2008 report from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development estimates that there are roughly 5,000 homeless people sleeping in Skid Row on any given night -- the highest concentration of homeless people in the country.

A 2009 joint report from the National Coalition for the Homeless and the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty singled out Los Angeles as the nation’s “meanest city” in terms of police enforcement of the homeless.

But a 2007 legal settlement between the city and the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California has watered down that “zero-tolerance” policy to “some-tolerance”. In the face of a 2003 lawsuit seeking to repeal a more than 40 year-old law that prohibits people from sleeping on public sidewalks, the city agreed that until it built 1,250 units of affordable housing it would not enforce the law, allowing people to sleep on public sidewalks from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. anywhere in the city.

Allowing people to sleep legally on public sidewalks may not be the solution to homelessness, but many experts on homelessness and civil rights agree that it represents a major step towards a solution. Arresting people for sleeping on sidewalks criminalizes homelessness, and that, many say, sustains homelessness. Others argue that it is the homeless themselves who perpetuate their own situation by refusing services and remaining on the street. They say the only effective way to deal with them is by strict enforcement and institutionalization.

These represent two of the dominant ideological perspectives on the issue — two states of mind that have shaped this country’s approach to homelessness for the past three decades. But in recent years, some public officials and civic leaders have begun to question the existing models for dealing with homelessness, arguing that the persistence of the problem shows that what has been done up until now isn’t working. Across the country, cities and communities are trying out new strategies to address the issue, and some of them have made significant progress and actually reduced homelessness for the first time in nearly 30 years. These new approaches have much to teach Los Angeles and other American cities that continue to struggle with homelessness today…”

Read the rest of the article here
—————————————————————————————————————–

—————————————————————————————————————–

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in NewsComments (0)


Architecture Lab on Facebook

Google Community

OUR FRIENDS

waste_pressrelease-16

BROWSE BY CATEGORIES

BROWSE BY DATE

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes