Search Results | ann hamilton

Nine Teams Reach Second Round of Gateway Arch Design Competition

Nine Teams Reach Second Round of Gateway Arch Design Competition

The City * The Arch * The River

——————————–
Contest organizers today announced the names of nine design teams selected to advance to the next round of the competition “Framing a Modern Masterpiece | The City * The Arch * The River” to invigorate the park and city areas surrounding the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, MO.
——————————–

The Arch has come to symbolize St. Louis as a Gateway between the east and western United States.

———————–
The lead designers and design teams are:

* Behnisch Architekten, Gehl Architects, Stephen Stimson Associates, Buro Happold, Transsolar, Applied Ecological Services, Limno‐Tech, Herbert Dreiseitl, Arne Quinze, Peter MacKeith, Eric Mumford
* FIT (Fully Integrated Thinking) Team – Arup, Doug Aitken Studio, HOK Planning Group, HOK
* Michael Maltzan Architecture, Stoss Landscape Urbanism, Rafael Lozano‐Hemmer, Richard Sommer, Buro Happold
* Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates, Steven Holl Architects, Greenberg Consultants, Uhlir Consulting, HR&A Advisors, Guy Nordenson and Associates, Arup, LimnoTech, Ann Hamilton Studio, James Carpenter Design Associates, Elizabeth K. Meyer, Project Projects
* PWP Landscape Architecture, Foster + Partners, Civitas, Ned Kahn, Buro Happold
* Quennell Rothschild and Partners and Diller Scofidio + Renfro, Vishkan Chakrabarti, Buro Happold, Atelier Ten, and Nicholas Baume
* Rogers Marvel Architects and Nelson Byrd Woltz Landscape Architects, Urban Strategies, Local Projects, Arup
* SOM, BIG, Hargreaves Associates, Jaume Plensa, URS
* Weiss/Manfredi, Magnusson Klemencic Associates, Mark Dion

“The Jury had the challenge of evaluating portfolios that represented designers of international and national recognition, emerging designers and design teams comprised of individuals that provide great promise as collaborators,” said competition manager Don Stastny, of StastnyBrun Architects. “The lead designers and design teams invited to participate in Stage II represent individuals and firms that have local, national and international ties – and have the potential to come up with extraordinary solutions to the design challenges presented by the City, the Arch and the River.”

The nine design leaders and teams now have five weeks to complete their teams and present full qualifications to the competition jury, Stastny said.
——————————–

The Gateway Arch with downtown St. Louis in the back and the Mississippi river in the front.

In addition, local contractors, minority, disadvantaged, or women‐owned businesses and others are invited to meet Feb. 18 from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m. at the Old Court House with representatives of the shortlisted design groups for potential teaming opportunities.

“This will be an excellent opportunity for these businesses to learn about the project and to begin considering participating,” Stastny said. “We look forward to a strong turnout.”

The competition, launched Dec. 8, 2009, has three stages. Portfolio submissions in Stage I included a description of the design team, a statement of design intent and philosophy of the lead designer, a profile of the design team and examples of their work. Each team was required to include representatives of architecture, landscape architecture, urban design, engineering and an artist.

Stage II involves the formation of the complete teams capable of executing the project, submission of required paperwork and a jury interview. This phase will culminate April 7, 2010, with the narrowing of the field to four or five teams.

The final stage, Stage III, to take place over the summer, will include a 90‐day design concept competition to explore the finalists’ design approach and test their working methodology.

View of the Gateway Arch from the observation area.

The competition’s goal is to create an iconic setting for the international icon, the Gateway Arch, honoring its immediate surroundings and weaving connections and transitions from the city and the Arch grounds to the Mississippi River, including the east bank in Illinois.

The public will be invited to two events this spring and summer. A “meet the designers night” will be held in late April. This summer, there will be a public exhibition of the designs. Details will be available soon.

The final jury pick will be announced on Sept. 24, 2010. The project will be constructed by Oct. 28, 2015.

The new design is called for in the National Park Service’s General Management Plan, which was developed with extensive public input over an 18‐month period and approved Nov. 23, 2009.

The competition is sponsored by the CityArchRiver 2015 Foundation, which includes National Park Superintendent Tom Bradley, St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay, community leaders from Missouri and Illinois, academics, architects and national park advocates.

Financial contributions to the CityArchRiver 2015 Foundation are being handled by the Greater St. Louis Community Foundation, a public charity with more than $140 million in charitable assets and representing more than 350 individual funds.

Donors to the competition include: Emerson, Gateway Center of Metropolitan St. Louis (Malcolm W. Martin Memorial Park), Peter Fischer, Emily Rauh Pulitzer, Civic Progress, Wachovia Wells Fargo Foundation, Danforth Foundation, John F. McDonnell, Bryan Cave LLP, Greater St. Louis Community Foundation, National Park Foundation, Monsanto, Alison and John Ferring, Bank of America, David C. Farrell and others who choose to remain anonymous.
——————————
A full list of registrants for the competition, “Framing a Modern Masterpiece: The City + The Arch + The River 2015,” has also been released. It can be found with other competition information at www.cityarchrivercompetition.org.
———————————————————————————————————-

———————————————————————————————————-

Posted in Competitions, Competitions & Events, News0 Comments

ANN HAMILTON TOWER by Ann Hamilton & Jensen Architects

ANN HAMILTON TOWER by Ann Hamilton & Jensen Architects

Ann Hamilton + Jensen Architects

AIA, San Francisco 2008 Merit Award for Excellence in Architecture:
The tower is the most recent addition to a collection of artworks designed and installed at the Oliver Ranch. Designed by the renowned artist Ann Hamilton in collaboration with Jensen Architects, the 78 foot tower is an elegant monument that is neither about views nor prominence in the landscape. Fundamentally conceived as a performance space, double helix stairs both separate and connect the performers and audience while openings in the tower allow occupants to inhabit the massive walls in various positions–sitting, standing, or laying horizontal— without giving views of the surrounding landscape.

” We collaborated with the artist Ann Hamilton on the development of this site-specific sculpture in the rolling hills of Sonoma County. More than a sculpture, the project is a 24′ diameter concrete tower, several stories tall, inside of which winds a double-helix spiral staircase. The structure is partially submerged below grade and is open at the top. The artist describes the project as an “un-tower”: there are no panoramic views of the landscape. Instead, the project “promises to take the visitors’ mobile eye and its corporal housing on a spiritual journey toward the light, moving progressively and incrementally away from the details of the observed world.” Jensen Architects


photo by Stephen Vincent
———————————————————————

Posted in Features3 Comments

Beadon Road – London

Beadon Road – London

Hamiltons

Description of the Beadon Road Project for Development Securities -
(As Published online on Hamiltons Official Website)

Project Description:
The TfL site in Hammersmith sits next to the Hammersmith & City line station and platforms. The brownfield site has lain empty for many years acting as an ugly scar on the face of the busy town centre.

The redevelopment proposal is for an office building with restaurants and a cinema looking over a large area of new public realm which will continue the theme of townscape improvements started with the landscaping of Lyric Square opposite.

The large building sits as a landmark in the town, and is softened in its impact by the use of curved surfaces both on plan and in elevation. This devices of using curved forms can often present a less aggressive form in the streetscape. Edges and corners are some of the most important visual clues that help define the form scale and shape of buildings, and their absence in a building that is curved both in plan and section can have a dramatic impact on their perceived presence in the streetscape.

The building is many facetted and is perceived differently from different view points. The pedestrian at street level will not perceive the extent of the building owing to the slope at high level on elevation and as a smooth form in longer views where the normal roof top paraphernalia is contained within a louvred screen which unifies the overall concept.”

Project Details:

Client: Development Securities
Size: 45,000m²
Project Status: Planning Approved

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Features0 Comments

Architecture Lab on Facebook
Subscribe

BROWSE BY DATE

BROWSE BY CATEGORIES

OUR FRIENDS

Architecture opzijnbest.nl

waste_pressrelease-16

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Featuring Recent Posts Wordpress Widget development by YD