Architecture Lab

Amsterdam Pedestrian Bridge A Proposal by Francesco Piffari

To design a new iconic bridge, it is essential to reflect on the concept of bridge; what a bridge is in the collective imagination.

Amsterdam Pedestrian Bridge A Proposal by Francesco Piffari

Project Details:
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Type: Competition Proposal
Architects: Francesco Piffari – www.francescopiffari.co.cc

Core Concept:
In the past a bridge was a connection between 2 points otherwise hard to reach, like a shortcut. Even today, indeed, it is considered just a link and a passing-by architecture made up of a suspended path.
Considering the bridge in its core meaning, it can be said that the peculiarities of a bridge is to “touch” the ground in just 2 points, to hover in the air and to be suspended over the obstacle; it is very clear that a bridge establishes a strong relationship with air and water, the two elements it is surrounded with.

Amsterdam Pedestrian Bridge A Proposal by Francesco Piffari
Amsterdam Pedestrian Bridge A Proposal by Francesco Piffari

Relation With Air
As nominally it is set to be just a slab thick enough to hold the required load, usually pretty thin, the relation between a bridge and the air, generates transparency and lightness. This is why this bridge is made by thin slabs which all spans across the Amstel Canal from one bank to the other; these slabs are overlapping each other to create the spaces required by the brief.

Relation With Water
The variable heights of the slabs over the canal make the visitor experiment different relations with water as he proceeds along the bridge: the cafe terrace gives a relaxing break, the two docks, where the slabs dip into the canal, make experience a direct connection and the bicycle repair garage gives the view of a bird flying an inch from the water.

Amsterdam Pedestrian Bridge Proposal
Amsterdam Pedestrian Bridge A Proposal by Francesco Piffari

Bridge Program
Although the project has several spaces for the ancillary functions, the main purpose of the bridge is preserved; therefore the pedestrian and bicycle flow is never encumbered, indeed the many functions are placed outside of it. Also the banks of the canal are preserved from any buildings which may cause an obstruction to the car, bicycle or pedestrian flow; reason why all the project program is condensed on the bridge within its limits.
The cafe is the biggest space of the project, has a wide terrace which overlook the iconic Stopera and has its own access from the bridge, straight from the bank and even from the canal thanks to its dock.
The bicycle repair stations is placed in a side space easy to be reached, just next to the main path and intentionally close to the big pedestrian area in front of the Heritage Museum.
The administration office is set in a more secluded place for a privacy purpose and to obtain a better working environment.
Beyond the required program, the project plans next to the cafe on the main path, a small exterior space to be used by the Heritage Museum to promote its main exhibition; and a small boat rental service in the dock next to the administration office.

Amsterdam Pedestrian Bridge A Proposal by Francesco Piffari
Amsterdam Pedestrian Bridge A Proposal by Francesco Piffari
Amsterdam Pedestrian Bridge A Proposal by Francesco Piffari
Amsterdam Pedestrian Bridge A Proposal by Francesco Piffari

, ,

  • Joseph Fouché

    Too bad you wasted your time on that- not that the design is not good, it’s just that this ac-ca and archtriumph- competitions are nothing but a scam-operation. The second prize winners used to work together with the guy, Damien Izoulet, who runs ac-ca in London. But nice bridge though, keep up the good work.

  • ArchTriumph

    WITHOUT PREJUDICE:

    Dear Mr Joseph Fouché,

    It is not ironic that you choose to hide behind the pseudonym “Joseph Fouché” the architect of the police state and the Prime Minister, the head of secret or national police force under Napoleon.

    We have tried on many occasion to contact you and now looking at the legal option to obtain your real identity and start litigation against you for libel or defamatory claims made against our company and associated personels. The setup of a facebook and livefyre account profiles for the sole purpose of sending and spreading vindictive, malicious posts and haressment of our team.

    Please do not for a second assume that the messages you send through cyberspace are immune from lawsuits. The Internet may be an informal forum and individuals often write personal things about other users, but you can be held accountable in court for making libelous or defamatory remarks in public forums.

    Mr Izoulet is not a director or in charge of ArchTriumph Awards. He is the senior consultant for AC-CA competition and we are proud and respect the work and service they provided to the architecture community, just as we are to the other competitions and architecture portals.

    Stating an opinion on an issue is one thing and defamation and haressment is something else. We are all for freedom of speech, but not without responsibilty.

    The team here work very hard and will not let inappropriate behaviour from individuals like yourself damaged our reputation or goodwill as we continue to serve the architecture community.

    K B STOWE
    ArchTriumph Management